This section defines the mechanisms that translate staking, voting, and performance into incentive allocation. Emission levels and monetary parameters are defined separately.
Combinder adapts the vote-escrow model from decentralized finance protocols like Curve and Aerodrome to energy markets.
Key difference: Instead of coordinating the capital allocation with the help of liquidity pools, Combinder coordinates flexibility allocation using flexibility pools (‘flex pools’) with fixed weekly capacity requirements.
<aside>
What’s a vote-escrow model?
‘VE’ models align long-term commitment of users with governance power and rewards. Participants lock tokens for a defined period and receive voting weight proportional to the amount and duration of the lock.
Voting directs incentive allocation across the system, to steer the network towards the most beneficial outcome.
</aside>
| Traditional ve-Model | Combinder | |
|---|---|---|
| Commodity | Liquidity | Energy Flexibility |
| Instrument | Liquidity Pool | Flex Pool |
| Suppliers | Liquidity Providers | DER owners |
| Method | Unlimited deposits | Fixed weekly capacity |
Each gauge combines device type with geographic location, ensuring that rewards align with the value contributed by specific zones and equipment types. This structure is essential for Combinder's regional network focus, as electricity markets operate with distinct regional characteristics and regulatory frameworks.
By organizing gauges around both device type (EV chargers, batteries, solar panels, smart appliances) and location (Berlin, Madrid, Paris, etc.), we create targeted incentive pools that:
This dual-axis approach ensures the protocol scales effectively across diverse markets while maintaining alignment between token incentives and real-world energy value.
A unified score serves dual purposes: qualifying for Tier 2 participation and determining emission distribution within your Flex Pool. The mechanism is oriented towards the S2 Standard, an open “communication standard for energy flexibility in homes and buildings”.
Where A = Availability, R = Response Time, C = Energy Capacity, E = Efficiency, D = Data Quality, S = Scaling Factor
Scores are weighted over 12 weeks, with recent performance counting more. Week N = 20%, Week N-1 = 15%, declining to 2.5% for weeks N-9 through N-12.
| Score | Status | Flex Pool Priority |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | Excellent | First |
| 75-89 | Good | Second |
| 60-74 | Fair | Third |
| <60 | Below | Tier 1 only |
Recovery is possible. The weighted system lets you bounce from 50 to 80 in about a month with consistent good performance.
$VGRD can be locked to receive veVGRD, which provides voting power and revenue participation.
| Lock Period | veVGRD Received | Multiplier |
|---|---|---|
| 4 years | 1,000 | 1.0× |
| 2 years | 500 | 0.5× |
| 1 year | 250 | 0.25× |
veVGRD is transferable, decays linearly until unlock and determines weekly emission allocation
← Previous: Token Overview
Next: Operating Model →